Pneumatics

When is a Standard Pneumatic Valve Not Good Enough?

Can Pneumatics Suppport Extreme Engineering - Parker hannifin Pneumatics Division Pneumatic valves work in a variety of applications to control the operation of actuators, including cylinders, clutches, rotary actuators, and airbags. In the transportation industry, components operate at wide temperature ranges for buses, trains, construction vehicles, agricultural equipment and implements, and semi-trucks.

However, using valves for applications in low-temperature environments—such as those found in transportation applications—can pose special challenges from both a manufacturer and OEM perspective. To understand why we’ll look into what goes into a valve manufacturer’s thought process in designing a standard valve. This will help further the understanding of valve design for applications where a standard product isn’t “good enough.”

Standard pneumatic directional control valves

A basic valve is typically manufactured with a metal or plastic body containing a sliding spool or disk. Actuated by a solenoid, air pilot or manual operator, the spool shifts to provide air flow from one or several communication ports to others. Standard valves feature general design characteristics to meet the considerable variation in standard performance requirements that is common across factory automation and heavy industrial applications.

pressure protection valve

Pressure protection valves are installed on vehicles such as semi-trucks to ensure that the air brakes, which are supplied from the primary reservoir, always have adequate pressure to function normally.

In great part, pneumatic valve manufacturers build valves with common features that meet or exceed customer expectations for performance and quality. In terms of performance, manufacturers consider:

  • size and flow expectations for the valve package size,

  • response time,

  • cycle life, and

  • leakage.

 

Response time is literally how long the valve takes to shift position. Response times typically vary between 5 and 40 msec.

Cycle life equates to how many cycles the valve can operate over its lifetime, with the number of cycles typically ranging from 20 to 40 million. This assumes the use of proper filtration, such as 5 to 40 µm, so the valve and actuator receive clean air.

Previously, designers basically relied on manufacturers’ spool technologies as a general rule to determine performance and cycle life. Today, valves from the major suppliers operate for tens of millions of cycles in non-lube systems; however, a majority of applications typically don’t require a cycle life of 20 million cycles. In fact, from the OEM’s point of view, the life of the valve usually exceeds the manufacturer’s warranty.

For standard valves, basic temperature specifications are often considered to be in the range of –14° to 122° F, with pressures ranging from vacuum to 145 psi. Valve manufacturers choose from a combination of internal designs containing seals, spools, lubrication, solenoid components, and connections based on these temperature ranges.

Once the basics are designed and tested, the manufacturer fine tunes design characteristics to limit the overall leakage factor of the valve. Unless the valve is specifically designed to be bubble tight—that is, with no measurable leakage of pressurized air—the valve will typically demonstrate some amount of leakage.

Valves have different spool designs, including spools that use O-rings for a seal, spools over-molded with a rubber seal, poppers with over molded or crimped seals, and metal to metal spool and sleeve construction. Sealing surfaces and general construction can often be altered to ameliorate the leakage factor.

Standard valve leakage can vary by manufacturer but typically is under 10 cc per minute. Valves are tested for leakage during factory assembly at ambient temperatures. Some standard valves can be used in “critical” applications, such as suspension control on semi-trucks. These valves can also be equipped with a unique solenoid for operation in intrinsically “safe” applications.

 

Article supplied by Gary Baumgardner, chief engineer, with support from William Service, marketing manager, and Rich McDonnell, market development manager, Pneumatic Division North America, Parker Hannifin. Originally published in Design World January 15, 2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other articles on pneumatic applications:

More Trends in Industrial Automation: FieldBus-based Pneumatic and Piezo-actuated Valve Technologies

All-weather Pneumatic Solutions Help Rail Operators Optimise Reliability

Pneumatics Technology Enhances Profitability in Rail Applications

How Can Pneumatic Technology Help Farmers Boost Their Crop Yields? Part 1 of 2

 

 

 

Categories
Recent Posts by Author

All You Need to Know About Air Motor Selection

The popularity of air motors is on the rise as a result of their many advantages. However, not all pneumatic motors are made the same, so choosing the right one for your application can prove...

Know Your Pneumatics: Safety Exhaust Valves

Any engineers who are involved in machine building as part of their core activities will know all about the EU Machinery Directive 2006/42/EC. Most will have stood in front of a newly built...

Understanding the Machinery Directive

In every manufacturing industry, machine safety is always a top priority. When operating in Europe, utilizing machinery and components with CE certification is the best way to ensure the reliability...
Comments

Have a question about Parker products or services? We can help: Contact Us!

Comments for When is a Standard Pneumatic Valve Not Good Enough?


Please note that, in an effort to combat spam, comments with hyperlinks will not be published.

Leave a comment





Captcha